An EOR company in India acts as the legal employer for your staff, running payroll, statutory contributions, and compliance so you can hire Indian talent without setting up a local entity. The best EOR companies in India in 2026 are Asanify, Deel, Multiplier, Remote, and Wisemonk. These EOR service providers in India differ most on price, India compliance depth, and onboarding speed. Asanify is the best value at $99 per employee per month, the lowest full-platform price in this list, with a full HRMS included, a 4.9/5 rating on G2, and a #1 G2 ranking for ease of use in Core HR and Payroll. A compliant EOR in India must handle PF at 12% of basic, ESI at 3.25% employer share, gratuity of 15 days salary per year, and TDS under Section 192.
Which Are the Best EOR Companies in India in 2026?
The top three EOR companies in India for 2026 are Asanify for best overall value, Deel for large multi-country teams, and Multiplier for APAC expansion. The table below compares the ten best EOR providers in India on starting price, onboarding speed, and India entity model, so you can spot the top EOR companies in India for your situation at a glance.
| Provider | Best for | Starting price (per employee/month) | Onboarding speed | India entity model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asanify | Best overall and best value | $99 flat | 48 hours | Direct India entity |
| Deel | Large multi-country teams | $599 | 1 to 3 days | Global platform |
| Multiplier | APAC expansion | from $400 | 1 to 2 days | Local India entity |
| Remote | Owned-entity assurance | $599 annual, $699 monthly | 1 to 3 days | Owned India entity |
| Papaya Global | Enterprise analytics | $650, $770 premium | Varies | Global platform |
| Rippling | IT plus HR in one | $499 to $599 (not listed) | Days | Global platform |
| Oyster | Remote-first SMBs | $499 annual, $699 monthly | Days | Global platform |
| Skuad | Growth-stage APAC | from $199 | Days | Local India entity |
| Globalization Partners | Large enterprise | $699 and up, custom | Varies | Global platform |
| Wisemonk | India-only niche | from $99 | 24 to 48 hours | India entity |
Hire in India Without a Legal Entity
Onboard your first employee in just 48 hours — no company setup required.
Asanify experts will guide your India hiring — book a meeting with an expert.
How We Chose These EOR Companies
We reviewed the providers most commonly shortlisted for India hiring and ranked the best EOR in India on five criteria: India statutory compliance depth across PF, ESI, TDS, and Professional Tax; pricing transparency and total cost of employment; onboarding speed; platform capability including whether an HRMS is included; and support quality. Ratings referenced here come from G2 and Capterra. Asanify is included and judged against the same criteria as every other provider.
1. Asanify: Best Overall and Best Value
G2 Rating: 4.9 out of 5, 350 plus reviews | Price: $99 per month | India Entity: Direct, Kolkata

Most companies pay $599 a month for India EOR because they assume that is what India compliance costs. It is not. Asanify manages the same PF filings, the same ESI contributions, the same TDS deductions, through its own Kolkata entity, for $99 a month. The difference is not service quality. It is that Asanify was built for India first, not retrofitted into a global platform as one of 150 countries.
Asanify is a Techstars-backed, AI-native Employer of Record and HRMS platform, ranked #1 globally on G2 for ease of use in Core HR and Payroll, with a 4.9 out of 5 rating across more than 350 reviews and a support-quality score of 9.7 out of 10. It owns and operates its legal entity directly in Kolkata, so PF filings, TDS deductions, ESI contributions, and employment contracts are handled entirely in-house, with no third party in the compliance chain.
The HRMS is included, not sold separately. Every provider on this list offers payroll and compliance. Asanify also includes attendance, leave, and expense management, performance reviews with 360-degree feedback, OKR tracking, and an applicant tracking system, all within the $99 package. Competitors charge separately for HRMS modules, if they offer them at all.
The WhatsApp HR bot is built for how Indian employees actually communicate. WhatsApp is the default messaging app for India’s workforce, so an employee in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, or Chennai does not need to download a new application to check a payslip, apply for leave, or query a PF balance. They send a WhatsApp message. No other EOR provider ships this natively. The ChatGPT integration via MCP goes further: lean HR teams can check payroll status, approve leave, and run compliance queries in natural language, and it is live today, not a roadmap item.
That capability shows up in real outcomes. Rukhsar Ahmed, Managing Director of Green Fulfilment, describes the operational value: “In my business, things happen fast, and requirement for new employees is sudden. In such a situation a trusted partner like Asanify comes in handy as I know I can quickly ramp with onboarding and employee formalities diligently taken care of.” On compliance specifically, Jason Palmer, President of Nobious, adds: “Whether it’s employee-contractor classification, or the local laws for employee benefits and working hours, I trust the guidance provided.” And on the included platform, Steph Freeman, GM People and Culture at Prospection: “I find a lot of value in the fully automated Asanify HRMS. It makes it absolutely comfortable that I can access all my HR information anytime, anywhere and on any platform.”
Best For
Companies where India is the primary or one of a handful of hiring markets, that want the lowest full-platform price with compliance and a complete HRMS in one system.
Key Features
- Direct India entity in Kolkata with full PF, ESI, TDS, gratuity, and Professional Tax management across all states
- 48-hour employee onboarding as standard
- Complete HRMS included: attendance, leave, expense, performance, OKR, and ATS
- WhatsApp HR bot for employee self-service
- AI payroll accuracy checks before every payroll run
- ChatGPT MCP integration for AI-powered HR management
- Global contractor onboarding and payments
- Transparent FX rates with no hidden spread
- 24/7 customer support, 9.7 out of 10 G2 support-quality score
- Free tools: Employee Cost Calculator, PE Risk Quiz, Payroll Compliance Calendar, Salary Breakup Calculator, Contractor Misclassification Quiz
Pros
- Lowest price in this list at $99 per month, with a direct India entity
- Ranked #1 on G2 for ease of use in Core HR and Payroll, with a 4.9/5 rating
- Complete AI-native HRMS included at no extra charge
- 48-hour onboarding, WhatsApp HR bot, ChatGPT integration, transparent FX, and 24/7 support
Cons
- Optimised for companies where India is the primary or one of a handful of hiring markets. If you need simultaneous EOR across 50-plus countries from day one, a global-first platform like Deel or Atlas HXM suits that specific case better. Most India-focused buyers are not in that situation, but it is worth knowing upfront.
Pricing
$99 per employee per month for India. Country-specific pricing transparently published for other markets at India pricing.
See the full employer of record India offering, or book a demo.
Compare directly: Asanify vs Deel | Asanify vs Gloroots | Asanify vs Wisemonk | Asanify vs Remote | Asanify vs Multiplier | Asanify vs Remofirst | Asanify vs Borderless AI

2. Deel: Best for Large Multi-Country Teams
G2 Rating: 4.8 out of 5 | Price: $599 per month | India Entity: Direct | Best For: Large enterprises running simultaneous EOR across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific

Deel is the most recognised name in global EOR and that recognition is earned. Owned entities in approximately 130 of its 150 plus operational countries, GDPR, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 compliance, and deep integrations with Xero, NetSuite, Azure, and Ashby give enterprise procurement teams the coverage and certification checklist they need.
For India-specific hiring, Deel is functionally competent. The compliance credentials are real. The platform stability is consistent. The problem is the price relative to what the India corridor specifically requires. At $599 per month, a 10-person India team costs $71,880 per year in platform fees before salary, statutory contributions, or the 3% to 5% FX markup Deel applies to cross-border payments. That markup adds $300 to $900 per employee per year on top of an already premium fee.
Deel earns its position for enterprises where 150-country breadth is genuinely needed from day one. It does not earn that price for companies whose primary requirement is India.
Key Features: EOR in 150 plus countries with owned entities in approximately 130, 2 to 3 day onboarding, 24/7 in-app support, GDPR, SOC 2, and ISO 27001, strong enterprise integrations, unified contractor and employee management
Pros: Most recognised global EOR brand, broad country coverage, strong compliance certifications, excellent integrations, consistent platform stability
Limitation: $599/month is six times Asanify’s India rate. FX markup of 3% to 5% adds significant hidden cost on every payroll run. Not cost-effective for India-focused hiring.
Pricing: $599 per month per employee. Compare at Asanify vs Deel.
3. Multiplier: Best for APAC Expansion
G2 Rating: 4.7 out of 5 | Price: $400 per month | India Entity: Direct | Best For: Companies expanding simultaneously across India and two or more Southeast Asian markets

Singapore-headquartered and APAC-rooted, Multiplier brings genuine regional depth across India, Singapore, Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia from its team of 100 plus in-country compliance experts. This is not a partner network presenting itself as regional expertise. It is documented in-market knowledge across Southeast Asia built over years of operation.
For India hiring specifically, onboarding completes in under 24 hours, multi-currency payroll runs in 120 plus currencies, and worker classification protections are clearly documented. For companies where India is one of three or more simultaneous APAC markets, Multiplier’s consolidated regional coverage provides genuine operational value that justifies its premium over India-only providers.
For companies where India is the sole or primary market, $400 per month is four times Asanify’s India rate for coverage you are not using. The cost-benefit calculation is straightforward in that scenario.
Key Features: 150 plus country coverage with genuine APAC depth, under 24-hour onboarding, multi-currency payroll in 120 plus currencies, 100 plus in-country compliance experts, instant employment contracts, full benefits and insurance administration
Pros: Real APAC multi-country expertise, fast onboarding, experienced local team, strong multi-currency capabilities
Limitation: $400/month is expensive for India-primary hiring. No complimentary HRMS. 24/5 rather than 24/7 support.
Pricing: $400 per month per employee. Compare at Asanify vs Multiplier.
4. Remote: Best for Owned-Entity Assurance
G2 Rating: 4.7 out of 5 | Price: $599 per month | India Entity: Direct | Best For: Remote-first companies with employees across multiple regions for whom IP protection is a compliance priority

Remote’s defining feature is Remote IP Guard, a standard inclusion in every employment contract that gives companies enforceable IP assignment agreements across 185 plus countries. For technology companies hiring engineers in India who will be contributing to proprietary codebases, this is not a trivial feature. It is the kind of protection that matters significantly if an employment dispute ever becomes a legal one.
Beyond IP protection, Remote’s owned-entity model, strong employee benefits administration, and well-reviewed self-service portal make it a genuinely capable platform. The email and chat-only support model is the most significant operational limitation. When a payroll error surfaces at 6pm IST before salary day, email support with a next-business-day response window is not sufficient.
For India-primary hiring, the $599 per month price carries the same challenge as Deel. The IP protection feature does not change the arithmetic of $60,000 per year in premium fees for a 10-person India team.
Key Features: 185 plus country coverage with owned-entity focus, Remote IP Guard, employee self-service portal and mobile app, multi-currency payroll, comprehensive health and pension benefits administration
Pros: Strong IP protection, excellent employee benefits, high G2 rating, scalable infrastructure, owned India entity
Limitation: $599/month with email and chat-only support. High FX rates on cross-border payments. No phone support limits urgency response for time-sensitive payroll issues.
Pricing: $599 per month per employee. Compare at Asanify vs Remote.
5. Papaya Global: Best for Enterprise Analytics
G2 Rating: 4.6 out of 5 | Price: $599 per month | India Entity: Partner, not direct | Best For: Large multinationals managing complex multi-region payroll with enterprise analytics requirements

Papaya Global’s AI-powered payroll engine, workforce analytics, and designated country expert model serve large enterprises running complex payroll programs across many regions simultaneously. WhatsApp-based customer support and cryptocurrency payment support are distinctive features at the enterprise tier.
For India-focused buyers, two limitations are material. Papaya Global does not own a direct India entity, operating through a partner network. And $599 per month is the premium price tier without the direct-entity accountability that justifies it for India specifically. For enterprise buyers where India is one country among many in a complex global payroll program, the trade-offs may be acceptable. For companies whose primary or sole hiring market is India, paying $599 per month through a partner entity when $99 direct-entity alternatives exist is difficult to rationalise.
Key Features: 160 plus country coverage, AI-powered payroll automation, workforce analytics, designated country expert team, multi-currency payments including cryptocurrency
Pros: Strong enterprise analytics, broad country coverage, dedicated country experts, crypto payment support
Limitation: No direct India entity. $599/month without direct-entity accountability for India. Invoicing inconsistencies noted in user reviews.
Pricing: $599 per month per employee. Compare at Asanify vs Papaya Global.
6. Rippling: Best for IT plus HR in One
India Entity: Direct | Price: Custom | Best For: Companies that need HR, IT provisioning, finance automation, and EOR managed from a single unified platform

Rippling reframes the question. It does not ask “which EOR do you need?” It asks “do you want one platform for your entire workforce operating system?” HR, IT provisioning, finance automation, and EOR management run from a single interface with 500 plus third-party integrations and automated tax filing across jurisdictions.
For companies where EOR is one requirement within a broader need for unified workforce infrastructure, the Rippling approach eliminates integration overhead and data fragmentation across systems. The platform also supports a structured transition from EOR to your own Indian entity when the team reaches the scale where a subsidiary makes financial sense.
The trade-off is that the EOR module cannot be purchased standalone. The full Rippling HRIS is required, pushing total cost significantly above EOR-only alternatives. No transparent pricing is published and setup complexity is materially higher than EOR-specialist platforms.
Key Features: Full workforce OS covering HR, IT, and finance, 500 plus third-party app integrations, automated payroll and tax filing, EOR to own entity transition pathway, workflow analytics
Pros: Most complete workforce platform, seamless integrations, strong analytics, structured India entity transition support
Limitation: EOR cannot be purchased standalone. No transparent pricing. No 24/7 support. Higher setup complexity than EOR-specialist providers.
Pricing: Custom. Contact sales. Compare at Asanify vs Rippling.
7. Oyster: Best for Remote-First SMBs
G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5 | Price: $599 per month | India Entity: Partner, not direct | Best For: Non-profits, NGOs, and mission-driven companies for whom Oyster’s social hiring programs create specific financial value

Oyster’s most distinctive feature is not a compliance capability or a platform integration. It is a social programme: the first year of EOR is free for non-profit organisations, and significant discounts apply for companies hiring refugees through the Oyster programme. For non-profits and NGOs, this creates tangible financial value that no other provider on this list matches.
For commercial companies evaluating on price, compliance depth, and platform quality, Oyster does not compete effectively with Asanify or Deel for India hiring. The $599 per month price, partner entity model for India, and $80 per month add-on for local benefits make it a weak choice outside its mission-driven niche. G2 ratings for customer support quality trail most competitors on this list.
Key Features: 185 plus country coverage, free first-year EOR for non-profits, refugee hiring discount programme, Oyster Academy with free HR tools, HRMS covering attendance, leave, expense, and equity
Pros: Non-profit and refugee hiring benefits unique in the market, broad country coverage, no setup fees
Limitation: $599/month with partner India entity. Poor customer support ratings on G2. $80/month extra for local benefits makes total cost higher than headline suggests.
Pricing: $599 per month per employee. Compare at Asanify vs Oyster.
8. Skuad: Best for Growth-Stage APAC
G2 Rating: 4.6 out of 5 | Price: $199 per month | India Entity: Direct | Best For: Budget-conscious companies wanting direct-entity India coverage combined with Southeast Asia access

Skuad occupies a specific gap in the market: direct India entity ownership at a below-$200 price point. For companies where $99 per month is genuinely unavailable as a budget option and where multi-country Southeast Asia coverage is needed alongside India, Skuad’s $199 per month with direct entity provides a reasonable compromise.
G2 ratings for ease of setup and support quality are strong at approximately 9 out of 10 for both. The platform limitations are real: recurring issues with automatic leave entitlement calculations, limited third-party integrations, and a lower overall user satisfaction ranking suggest adoption challenges post-onboarding that budget-conscious buyers should evaluate carefully.
Key Features: 160 plus country coverage, direct India entity, single platform for benefits, tax, and localised contracts, 24/7 expert support, IP and data protection, worker misclassification protections
Pros: $199/month with direct India entity, 24/7 support, strong ease of setup, India and Southeast Asia coverage
Limitation: Leave calculation errors reported by users. Limited integrations. FX markup adds to total cost. Lower overall G2 user satisfaction relative to price tier.
Pricing: $199 per month per employee. Compare at Asanify vs Skuad.
9. Globalization Partners: Best for Large Enterprise
India Entity: Mixed | Price: Custom | Best For: Large enterprises already operating within the G-P ecosystem with confirmed multi-country hiring requirements across 180 plus markets

G-P is where the EOR category started. As one of the original enterprise providers, it brings 180 plus country coverage, dedicated country specialist teams, a 99% payroll accuracy claim, and enterprise SLA guarantees that large procurement teams recognise and trust. Its G-P Meridian platform provides integrated global hiring and workforce management at a scale that smaller providers cannot match.
The operational dependencies are worth understanding before signing. G-P partners with ADP and Zoho for HR and payroll infrastructure rather than operating a fully proprietary platform, creating third-party dependency at the core of the service. Pricing is not published and is typically estimated at 15% to 20% of employee gross salary or $599 to $1,500 per month depending on market and headcount. For India-primary hiring, the opaque pricing, mixed entity model, and ADP dependency make G-P difficult to justify when transparent direct-entity alternatives at $99 per month exist.
Key Features: 180 plus country coverage, dedicated country specialist teams, global recruiting services, 99% payroll accuracy claim, full tax and benefits administration, G-P Meridian integrated platform
Pros: Widest enterprise country coverage, established compliance track record, dedicated account management, global recruiting support
Limitation: No transparent pricing. ADP and Zoho dependency. Complexity beyond SME requirements. Core features carry additional charges in some tiers.
Pricing: Custom. Estimated $599 to $1,500 per month depending on market and headcount.
10. Wisemonk: Best for India-Only Niche
India Entity: Direct | Price: Custom | Best For: Companies with simultaneous hiring across multiple Indian states who need hands-on compliance advisory as a core service

Where most EOR providers treat multi-state India compliance as a checkbox, Wisemonk treats it as the core service. Its compliance-first model provides genuine depth on PF, ESI, TDS, state-level labour law variation, and concurrent onboarding across Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, and NCR simultaneously.
For companies building GCCs with employees across multiple Indian states from day one, Wisemonk’s localised advisory capability is a real operational advantage. For companies that want a modern self-service platform and transparent published pricing, Wisemonk falls short. No pricing is published, which makes budget planning harder and requires a sales conversation before meaningful comparison is possible.
Key Features: Direct India entity, end-to-end EOR covering hiring, payroll, and compliance, multi-state India coverage, dedicated local compliance advisory, employment contract management per Indian labour law
Pros: Deep India compliance expertise, direct entity, genuine multi-state specialisation, hands-on advisory model
Limitation: No published pricing requires a sales call for basic cost comparison. Platform automation and HRMS features are less developed than Asanify or Deel.
Pricing: Custom. Contact sales. Compare at Asanify vs Wisemonk.
How Much Do EOR Companies in India Cost?
EOR companies in India typically charge between $99 and $700 or more per employee per month, with India-focused providers at the lower end and global enterprise platforms at the higher end. Asanify sits at the bottom of that range at $99 flat. On top of the EOR fee, you pay the employee’s gross salary plus statutory employer costs.
A concrete example shows the full picture. For an employee on ₹12,00,000 per year, which is ₹1,00,000 per month, hired through Asanify at $99:
| Component | Amount (per month) |
|---|---|
| Gross salary | ₹1,00,000 |
| PF (12% of basic) | about ₹7,200 |
| Gratuity accrual (about 4.81% of basic) | about ₹2,885 |
| Professional Tax (state-dependent) | about ₹200 |
| EOR fee ($99) | about ₹8,300 |
| Total all-in | about ₹1,18,585 |
ESI does not apply here because the employee earns above ₹21,000 per month. For a full cost breakdown see the employer of record India cost guide, or estimate your own with the India employee cost calculator.

What Statutory Compliance Must an EOR Handle in India?
A compliant EOR in India must manage every statutory contribution and filing accurately under the relevant labour laws, because errors carry penalties. These are the rates to check any provider against:
| Statutory item | Rate or rule | Governing law |
|---|---|---|
| Provident Fund (PF) | 12% of basic salary, employer share | EPF and MP Act, 1952 |
| ESI | 3.25% employer share, for employees earning up to ₹21,000/month | ESI Act, 1948 |
| Gratuity | 15 days salary per year of service, from day one, payable after 5 years | Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 |
| Professional Tax (PT) | up to ₹2,500 per year, varies by state | State Professional Tax Acts |
| TDS | deducted at source on salary | Section 192, Income Tax Act, 1961 |
| Total employer burden | typically 13% to 18% on top of gross salary | combined statutory load |
A capable EOR also handles multi-state Professional Tax differences and automated 24Q generation, which Asanify includes.
EOR vs PEO vs Setting Up an Entity in India
An EOR is the fastest route to hire in India without your own entity, a PEO suits companies that already have an India entity, and setting up your own entity makes sense only at large, long-term headcount. The table compares the three.
| Option | You need a local entity? | Time to hire | Best when |
|---|---|---|---|
| EOR | No | 48 hours to a few days | You want to hire in India quickly without setting up a company |
| PEO | Yes | Depends on your entity | You already have an India entity and want shared HR administration |
| Own entity | Yes, you create it | Several months | You have large, long-term India headcount and want full control |
For most foreign companies entering India, an EOR removes the entity-setup time and the ongoing compliance burden, which is why it is the most common starting point.
How Do You Choose an EOR Company in India?
Choose an EOR company in India by weighing six factors: India statutory compliance depth, pricing transparency and total cost, onboarding speed, platform capability including whether an HRMS is included, support quality, and exit flexibility. India-only hiring favours a specialist or a value platform like Asanify, while multi-country programs may justify a higher-priced global platform.
Questions worth asking on a demo call:
- How do you handle Professional Tax across different states?
- Is your India pricing flat, or a percentage of salary?
- Is an HRMS included, or charged separately?
- How fast is onboarding, and what does it cover?
- Who manages PF, ESI, and 24Q filings, and on what deadlines?
Red Flags to Watch for in Any India EOR Contract
These are universal warning signs. They apply regardless of which provider you are evaluating.
No direct India entity disclosed in writing. If a provider cannot confirm the Indian company name and CIN registration number of the entity that will be the legal employer, ask for it. Verify it independently on the Ministry of Corporate Affairs portal at mca.gov.in. “We have India coverage” is not the same as “we own an Indian Private Limited entity.”
Vague FX methodology. Ask for the exact USD to INR conversion methodology in writing. “Best available rates” is not an answer. Ask for the specific spread applied against the RBI reference rate on payroll date and get it in the contract.
No written commitment to PF and ESI filing deadlines. PF contributions must be deposited by the 15th of each month. ESI contributions must be deposited by the 21st. If a provider will not commit these deadlines in writing, that is a meaningful compliance risk signal.
Security deposits not disclosed upfront. Some providers hold $10,000 to $20,000 per employee as a deposit. This is your capital held interest-free. Confirm whether deposits are required, how much they are, and on what timeline they are returned on offboarding.
No explanation of Labour Code tracking. Ask any provider you evaluate to explain their specific process for monitoring state-level Labour Code implementation notifications. A provider that responds with a generic answer about staying current with regulations rather than a specific workflow has not built the tracking infrastructure the question is probing for.
Support availability not specified. Find out exactly what “24/7 support” means. Is it a live human with India compliance expertise or an automated ticketing system with a 48-hour response SLA? The difference matters at 11pm before payroll day
Questions to Ask Every India EOR Provider Before Signing
The quality of answers tells you as much as the answers themselves. Use these in your evaluation calls.
What is the registered Indian company name and CIN number for the entity that will be the legal employer for my employees?
Which Indian states have you actively processed payroll in over the last 12 months and can you share the state-specific PF and ESI registration numbers?
How do you handle simultaneous hiring in Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu given the different Professional Tax rates and Shops and Establishments requirements?
What is your exact process when EPFO raises a PF compliance query or audit request for one of my employees?
What FX conversion methodology applies to my USD to INR payroll and what is the spread against the RBI reference rate on payroll date?
Can you share a sample employment contract for an employee in Bengaluru including the notice period, leave entitlements, and gratuity clause?
What is your average resolution time for a payroll error reported by an employee on salary day and who specifically handles it?
How are you tracking state-level implementation of the Code on Social Security 2020 and how will you notify me when state-level changes affect my employees’ contribution structures?
The Bottom Line: Which EOR Company Should You Choose?
For most companies hiring in India, Asanify is the strongest choice on value and platform. At $99 per employee per month flat, it is the lowest full-platform price in this list, it includes a full HRMS that no competitor here bundles, it onboards in 48 hours through a direct India entity, and it holds a 4.9/5 rating on G2 with a #1 G2 ranking for ease of use in Core HR and Payroll. A higher-priced global platform such as Deel or Remote earns its premium only when you need owned-entity coverage across many countries at once. If India is your main hiring market and you want low, predictable cost with compliance and HRMS in one system, Asanify is the pick. You can see the full India offering on the employer of record India page or book a demo.
Frequently Asked Questions
Asanify. Direct legal entity in Kolkata, $99 per month, 48-hour onboarding, 4.9 out of 5 on G2 across 350 plus reviews, number one globally for ease of use in Core HR and Payroll, and a complete AI-native HRMS included at no extra charge. No other provider on this list combines all of those attributes at any price.
India EOR pricing runs from $99 per month at the India-specialist tier to $599 per month at the global enterprise tier. The price difference reflects two factors: geographic breadth across 150 plus countries, and platform architecture. Asanify at $99 per month is cheaper than $599 providers not because it offers less compliance quality, but because it was built for India first rather than built for 150 countries and then fitted with India coverage. India-first architecture means direct statutory relationships, no partner markup, and lower operational overhead.
A direct entity EOR owns its Indian legal entity and manages PF, ESI, TDS, and employment contracts in-house. When a compliance problem surfaces, accountability sits with the provider you contracted with and it is resolved internally. A partner model EOR routes your employees through a third-party Indian firm. When problems surface, the accountability chain involves a company you never contracted with, creating resolution delays and legal exposure gaps. Nine of the fifteen providers on this list use partner models for India. Six own their entity directly.
Provident Fund at 12% employer contribution, ESI at 3.25% employer contribution for employees earning up to Rs 21,000 per month, TDS deductions under Section 192 of the Income Tax Act, Professional Tax at state-specific rates across all states where employees are located, Gratuity accrual from day one payable after 5 years, Bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act 1965, and all state-level Shops and Establishments Act requirements.
Asanify onboards standard profiles in 24 to 48 hours. Most India EOR specialists complete onboarding in 48 to 72 hours. Global enterprise platforms like Atlas HXM and G-P can take 5 to 10 days for complex profiles. Always confirm the specific timeline for your employee’s state location and role type, not just the headline number.
Yes, and multi-state capability should be a baseline requirement rather than a premium feature when you evaluate providers. This includes different Professional Tax rates, state-specific holiday calendars, state-level Shops and Establishments Act requirements, and any state-specific labour registration requirements. Wisemonk has particular depth in simultaneous multi-state onboarding. Asanify manages multi-state compliance in-house across all major Indian cities and states.
An EOR is the sole legal employer, with all employment liability sitting with the provider. A PEO is a co-employment model where liability is shared with your company. India’s legal framework aligns more naturally with the EOR model for foreign companies without a local entity. PEO structures are less common and more complex to execute compliantly in India.
Evaluate the transition when you exceed 40 to 50 employees or confirm a minimum three-year commitment to India operations. Below that threshold, EOR is almost always cheaper and more flexible. Asanify and Remunance both provide structured support for the transition process. The transition involves incorporating an Indian Private Limited company, obtaining PF and ESI registrations, and transferring payroll from the EOR entity to your own.
A current India EOR provider tracks state-level implementation notifications for all four Labour Codes and updates employment contracts and payroll structures accordingly. The Code on Social Security 2020 is the most consequential for foreign employers because it expands PF and ESI coverage when fully implemented. Ask any provider you evaluate for their specific process for monitoring and implementing state-level Labour Code notifications.
Yes. EOR is the standard bridge solution for GCC setup, typically used for the first 6 to 18 months while the subsidiary is being incorporated and registered. Asanify and Gloroots both have specific experience supporting GCC setup transitions. The key is choosing a provider that can support the transition to your own entity when the time comes, not just the EOR phase.
This is a legitimate risk question that deserves a direct answer. Choose providers with direct India entity ownership, multi-year documented operating history, and transparent funding backgrounds. Ensure employment contracts name the specific Indian legal entity, not just the provider brand name. Review continuity and assignment clauses before signing. Asanify is Techstars-backed with a multi-year operating track record. Remunance has 21 years of operating history. Both represent lower continuity risk than newer entrants with limited operating history.
Yes. Asanify’s Global Contractor Management platform handles contractor onboarding, contract generation, and payments in 200 plus countries from the same platform as your EOR employees. The Contractor Misclassification Quiz helps you determine correct classification before onboarding to avoid backdated liabilities.
Asanify applies transparent FX rates with no hidden spread. This is a meaningful difference from providers like Deel and Remote that apply 1% to 3% FX markup on every payroll run. On a Rs 15 lakh annual salary, a 2% markup adds approximately $400 per employee per year in charges that do not appear on the headline monthly fee.
All major cities and states including Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune, Chennai, NCR covering Delhi, Gurugram, and Noida, Mumbai, Kolkata, and all tier two cities. Multi-state compliance is managed in-house with no additional charge for state-level variation.
Asanify connects to ChatGPT via MCP, allowing HR teams to manage operations through natural language. You can check payroll status, approve leave requests, access employee data, generate compliance reports, and run queries through a ChatGPT conversation without logging into a separate platform. This is the only EOR provider currently offering this capability.
Asanify and Remunance both start at $99 per month and both own direct India entities. Asanify additionally includes a full AI-native HRMS, WhatsApp HR bot, ChatGPT integration, and global contractor management. Remunance offers the longer compliance track record at 21 years. Both are significantly cheaper than every other provider on this list.
Not to be considered as tax, legal, financial or HR advice. Regulations change over time so please consult a lawyer, accountant or Labour Law expert for specific guidance.
